Radiology · Evidence depth: moderate

Interventional Radiology (IR)

High.

Ownership-sensitivity model

The 10 vectors of a physician career.

Every path is scored 0-100 across 10 critical dimensions using public-data signals, modeled assumptions, and verification prompts. Modeled estimate. Not a salary survey. See methodology.

82/100

Income ceiling

A strong ceiling, but heavily dependent on building an outpatient OBL.

The reality

IR procedures pay well, but paradoxically, high-speed diagnostic reading often pays better per hour.

The signal

OBL ownership (Office-Based Lab) is the new frontier for IR wealth (PAD, vein ablation, Uterine Fibroid Embolization).

The catch

Without an OBL, your income is strictly capped by hospital RVUs and emergency call.

The verdict

A fantastic wealth-builder lane only if you possess extreme entrepreneurial drive.

40/100

Lifestyle control

Low control; you are the hospital's ultimate 'fix-it' service.

The reality

You will be constantly interrupted for urgent abscess drains, nephrostomy tubes, and life-threatening bleeding.

The signal

The daily schedule is frequently destroyed by unpredictable inpatient add-ons from the ICU and ER.

The catch

You completely surrender the lifestyle control of diagnostic radiology for the thrill of the procedure.

The verdict

Requires a high tolerance for chaos and a lack of daily autonomy.

Premium analysis

8 more dimensions scored, with the reasoning behind each

See plans and unlock

The scores are below. Premium adds what sits behind each one: the claim, the signal supporting it, the limitation that weakens it, and what it should change about your decision.

Sleep / call burdenLower is better80/100
Ownership / facility upsideHigher is better70/100
Geography flexibilityHigher is better70/100
Innovation / industry adjacencyHigher is better85/100
Training opportunity costLower is better50/100
Job-market densityHigher is better75/100
Malpractice / litigation pressureLower is better60/100
Burnout-mismatch riskLower is better65/100

Scores are modeled from the specialty module's evidence and are estimates, not measurements. Confidence and data depth are labeled inside every premium card.

DoctorCalculator modeled income structure

Derived model. Directional

Modeled base range

$505k - $640k

Anchored to Doximity 2025 Physician Compensation Report subspecialty row (Doximity 2025 public specialty table row 'Interventional Radiology').

Production upside

$685k - $860k

Procedure mix spans hospital call and ownable outpatient work; the OBL share determines the real ceiling.

Ownership upside

High

OBL ownership (peripheral, fibroid, prostate embolization). IR's growing office-based lane.

Salary-only gap

Moderate

Hospital-employed IRs forgo OBL facility economics; the cited survey's near-parity with DR reflects mostly employed settings.

Modeled estimate. Not a salary survey. Derived model. Directional only. Verify against real offers, contracts, and local mentors. Income scales with payer mix, ownership, and geography. See methodology.

Want the code-level view behind numbers like these? Open the RVU calculator for this specialty's procedures, CMS times, and locality-adjusted Medicare rates.

External benchmark reference

Verify independently

~$600k

External benchmark reference - verify independently. Not ingested DoctorCalculator source data.

Hospital-employedPrivate group (Hybrid DR/IR)

Best fit

The Procedure-Heavy Wealth Builder. Top-tier income through volume, procedures, production, and ownership.
The Acute-Care Identity Seeker. Energized by intensity, emergencies, and high-stakes work.

Poor fit

The Protected-Sleep Specialist. Strong income without surrendering your nights.
The Lifestyle-First Clinician. A good life on sane hours, and the math actually works.

Premium detail

Common regrets on this path

See plans and unlock

2 documented regrets for this path, each with the burnout driver behind it and the question to verify it against a real schedule before you commit. Written from field notes on this specialty, not generic career advice.

Evidence

How we know, and what we do not

Low-confidence estimateLow confidence

Diagnostic Radiology (Private) vs Interventional Radiology: volume vs procedural RVUs.

Why it matters: DR private practice relies heavily on read volume and teleradiology leverage, while IR involves direct patient care, clinical E&M, and procedural risk.
Supporting signal: Evidence depth: limited
Limitation: Evidence depth is limited; use as a question prompt, not a conclusion.
Decision impact: Determine preference for patient interaction vs high-volume diagnostic throughput.
Source: Automated Radiology Digest